Hot News: Vietnam Pepper Farmers Suffer Hard Times

phu-quoc-pepper-3

Pepper plants in Vietnam

As a rule, shoppers have no clue where the spices they crave come from. In the case of black pepper, there’s a good chance it comes from Vietnam, the world’s largest supplier.

So?

There’s a good chance pepper prices at the grower/wholesaler level will vary a lot this year. While that, like most raw commodity price changes, is unlikely to directly affect you, it’s worth considering that, if you bother to read ingredient labels, you’ll find pepper showing up in way more things than you’d have suspected; And ingredient prices, collectively, definitely influence products’ shelf prices. Not a lot, where an individual ingredient is concerned – probably not even a noticeable amount.

But when several ingredients prices go up more or less in synch, so, sadly, will the total price of your shopping cart of goods. (We’ve all noticed that prices aren’t prone to drop, when underlying conditions change, as quickly as they rise!)

Of course that’s an extreme example of how, and/or why, retail product prices rise. But sometimes, as consumers, we need to pause before blaming the retailer for a price rise and consider, as it were, the source.

In the case of black pepper, currency exchange rates have in recent years had a dramatic impact on what farmers receive for their crops. Meaning, in turn, what users – product manufacturers/processors, for the most part – pay.

The website Vietnamnews.vn noted recently that from 2012 to 2016, when the price of black pepper peaked at VNĐ220,000 (US$9.6) per kilo – a kilo is roughly 2.2 pounds – locals rushed to grow the plant.

When the price shot up, more farmers planted pepper, often borrowing to do so. When the price fell, to as low as VNĐ55,000 ($2.35 per kilo) at the end of 2016, many farmers were seriously hurt, many fatally, and the debt load too often was overwhelming for newcomers and some old-timers as well.

Mai Liệu, of Ia Blứ Commune in Chư Pứh District, said that pepper had once made some farmers “millionaires”, but now the same farmers are in serious debt. They have had to sell their houses and land, and have even left their hometowns to work in other provinces.

“Smaller pepper farming households have fallen into even more miserable situations, including displacement from their homes,” Liệu said.

Commune chairman Phan Văn Linh said that farmers borrowed bank loans to grow pepper when prices soared, but then stopped growing the plant when prices began to drop.

The farmers were unable to pay back bank loans even after seeking “black credit”, Linh said.

According to figures from Gia Lai’s agricultural sector, the province’s black-pepper growing area expanded to 16,000ha – a hectare [ha] is close to 2.5 acres – last year, though only 6,000ha of pepper were officially planned to 2020.

Between those problems and a pepper pest that seriously affected many acres of the spice a couple of year ago, times have been tough for many of those producers of many people’s favorite spice.

 

Advertisements

Food Recalls: Almost a Daily Occurrence

USDA-FSIS-large-Source-USDA-FSISFood recalls are – no exaggeration – so nearly an everyday occurrence these days that, for the most part, consumers scarcely notice them.

That doesn’t make sense? Sure it does: It points to how efficiently the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) gets the word, then gets the word out to product distributors and retailers.

A case in point: Yesterday, the FSIS issued the following press release:

WASHINGTON, May 17, 2019 – Caito Foods LLC., an Indianapolis, Ind. establishment, is recalling approximately 1,767 pounds of salad with chicken products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today. The products contain soy, a known allergen, which is not declared on the product label.

The ready-to-eat salads with chicken items were produced on May 12 through May 15, 2019. The following products are subject to recall: [View Labels (PDF only)]

  • 13.5-oz. plastic square bowl packages containing “Greek Salad with Chicken with Chicken Breast & Red Wine Olive Oil Vinaigrette Dressing” and Sell By dates ranging from 05/18/19 through 05/21/19 represented on the label.
  • 11.25-oz. plastic square bowl packages containing “Tuscan Style Caesar Salad with Grilled Chicken With Grilled White Chicken Tossed In Pesto” and Sell By dates ranging from 05/18/19 through 05/21/19 represented on the label.

kroger_logo

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “P-39985” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to Kroger retail locations in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, and Ohio.

The problem was discovered by the recalling firm during label verification activities.

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

FSIS is concerned that some product may be in consumers’ refrigerators. Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify that recalling firms are notifying their customers of the recall and that actions are being taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website at www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls.

Consumers with questions about the recall can contact Caito Foods LLC.’s Consumer Feedback Line at (844) 467-7278. Members of the media with questions about the recall can contact Meredith Gremel, Organizational Communications, Spartan Nash, at (616) 878-2830.

Spartan Nash is described by Wikipedia as “SpartanNash is an American food distributor and grocery store retailer headquartered in Byron Center, Michigan. In terms of revenue, it is the largest food distributor serving military commissaries and exchanges in the United States.”

As the press release notes, the recall affects product distributed to stores of one retailer, Kroger – the nation’s largest supermarket company – to stores in in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, and Ohio.

Rest assured, Kroger got the word before that press release went out – and it promptly ensured that none of the potentially affected product made it to display cases.

That’s why consumers, and consumer-serving media outlets, seldom actually need to raise red flags about a potential allergen or whatever in this or that batch of Product X: The word’s already out where it needs to be, across the distribution chain, and the problem’s been dealt with.

The cause of the problem is another issue: How did it happen, what the company had to do to ensure the issue won’t crop up again – those points were, you can be sure, are being addressed as we speak.

Among the greatest risks and dangers posed by the Trump administration is it’s indiscriminate elimination of rules and regulations that, over the years, have been put in place for good, well-thought-out reasons. It’s   not just Americans, but citizens in all countries American food producers export to that need fear the random reduction of rules and regulations for food handling, packing, distribution and selling.

The food industry polices itself pretty efficiently, but the ‘policeman around the corner’ in the form of those rules and regulations enables retailers, and consumers, to breath easily, knowing they are protected.

Bartender Drinks, Drives, Dies; Blames Tiger Woods

tiger_woods_01

Tiger Woods flips his ball as he walks along the ninth green during a practice round for the PGA Championship golf tournament, Monday, May 13, 2019, in Farmingdale, NY.   (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

The family of a bartender in a restaurant owned by Tiger Woods is suing the golfer, somehow blaming him because, after serving himself too many, the employee died in a single-car accident.

Next, a convenience store customer will sue the lad at the checkout who, after properly carding her, bagged and handed over a paid-for six-pack.

The reason for this suit: The clerk supposedly should have known the customer would down the entire six pack in the parking lot then drive over an embankment, causing the car to crash, catch fire, and severely burn the customer.

The latter makes as much sense as the former, right?

Sadly, Woods and his girlfriend, Erica Herman, who is listed as general manager of his Florida restaurant, are being sued – for wrongful death.

These days, you have to think there’s a totally unreasonable possibility that the court will see for the plaintiff – the now-deceased drunk bartender. Regardless of the plaintiff’s stupidity leading to the cause for the suit.

The civil complaint in the Tiger Wood case says restaurant employees – and, by default, the owner – should have kept the off-duty bartender from drinking, or at least drinking ‘too many’, because they knew he had been attending AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) meetings. The fact that he did drink too many was attested to by his blood alcohol level of .256 – three times the legal limit.

CNN reported that the wrongful death suit is asking for an unspecified amount of damages.

This is a ridiculous lawsuit. But it exemplifies how victim-friendly juries in the US have become. And the trend is a bad one.

A side story: Thirty or so years ago, I worked in a bar/restaurant owned by a couple of guys whose understanding of the hospitality business came from their prior ownership of a nightclub. It burned down. They opened, just down the road, the place I worked in.

From all appearances, their focus was on seeing that their friends – and they seemed to have a lot of them – had fun… and that the booze kept flowing.

And flow it did: While the restaurant did a so-so business – three-quarters filled once then about half that volume on the ‘second turn’ on most nights except Saturday (which did better), the bar was a genuine cash cow.

The bartenders – there usually were two – were busy, not just serving customers but schmoozingly encouraging customers to buy more. And keeping the table servers happy: Several of us servers had a ‘thing’ going where we’d order, say, three drinks for a table and one for ourselves. It was pretty obvious to the staff that the tabs weren’t checked too closely by management, because the servers were seriously cutting into profits.

Some but not all servers drank from the time they put their first order in through closing time. Then the fun began.

The manager/owners invited ‘friendly’ servers to join them and their friends at the bar, where all carried on drinking, on the house, for a couple of hours or more. My drink of choice was Jack Daniels with a Heineken. On a typical night, after already having sipped through several Heinies while serving, I’d knock off two, three or more of those combos. Then drive home.

In that restaurant’s first three months, at least three staff members crashed their cars on the way home. I was among them.

At that time, my then wife and I rented an apartment in a pricey Connecticut town called home by many well-heeled Wall Street types. The local cops were, shall we say, ‘generous’ in their treatment of gentle drunk drivers. (I looked young, perhaps young enough to be mistaken for one of the well-off’s offspring.) Not only wasn’t I charged – after running down a row of guardrails and impaling my car thereon – I got a front-seat ‘free ride in a cop car’ home. (Cop car front seats then weren’t occupied by a computer and other high-tech gear, as they are today.)

There is no way that would happen anywhere today!

Woods reportedly was drinking with the bartender, Nicholas Immesberger, 24, a couple of night before the night in question, when he left Woods’ establishment three hours after his shift ended. Shortly thereafter, he crashed his Corvette and died.

His family’s suit alleges that the employees and management at Woods’ place promoted drinking by employees. As did those where I worked.

A fellow worker of mine not only crashed her car, she was hospitalized for several weeks. There was no talk – to my knowledge – of suing the restaurant for ‘encouraging’ staffers to drink on the job.

But they did.

US supermarkets are increasingly offering wine bars and other drinking ‘opportunities’ – beyond wine tasting, which, realistically, it would be hard for (most) customers to abuse.

That’s a fact that food sellers and their shoppers need to keep in mind: The former for insurance reasons, the latter because, despite the retailer’s best efforts, some people will over-imbibe. Then drive home.

And shoppers, truth be told, owe it to merchants to behave responsibly where drink and food samples – surely a subject for another posts! – are concerned.

 

 

‘Customer Complaints? Here’s How To Deal With Them’: Advice From USDA

complaints

The following is a press release from the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2019 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued today a best practices guideline to help the meat and poultry industry respond to customer complaints that are determined to be associated with adulterated or misbranded meat and poultry products.

“FSIS has placed renewed emphasis on industry responding to customer complaints of foreign materials in meat and poultry and, as required, reporting those incidents to the agency within 24 hours once the determination has been made that the product is adulterated,” said FSIS Administrator Carmen Rottenberg. “We will continue to work with industry and offer guidance to assist them in complying with agency regulations.”

Update of 2012 Regulation

In 2012, FSIS announced a regulation requiring all establishments to report to the agency within 24 hours when they have shipped or received an adulterated product and that product is in commerce. While this requirement has been in effect for several years, recalls associated with foreign materials in product increased in recent years. FSIS intensified efforts and made presentations in 2018 to industry explaining that product containing foreign materials is adulterated even when a physical food safety hazard is not present. Additionally, the agency hosted two industry meetings to discuss an industry-drafted document of best practices for responding to foreign material customer complaints, which was published in August 2018.

FSIS began working on the guideline announced today in mid-2018 to provide reference material on best practices and recommendations on how to receive, investigate and process customer complaints.   While FSIS specifically developed this document to address foreign material customer complaints, establishments can apply the information to other customer complaints of adulterated or misbranded products in commerce. When an establishment needs to recall adulterated product from commerce, the establishment must identify the cause of the product adulteration and take steps to prevent recurrence in its Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan, which federal inspectors review.

Agency’s Current Position

The guideline reflects the agency’s current position, and FSIS encourages the industry to begin using it now.  FSIS welcomes public comments on the guideline. The agency will accept comments for 60 days and will then update the document in response to suggestions, if necessary. Comments may be submitted via the federal eRulemaking portal at: http://www.regulations.gov; by mail including CD-ROMs sent to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1400 Independence Avenue S.W., Mailstop 3758, Room 6065, Washington, D.C., 20250-3700 or by hand-or courier-delivery to 1400 Independence Avenue S.W., Room 6065, Washington, D.C., 20250-3700. All items submitted by mail or electronic mail must include the agency name and docket number FSIS-2018-0034

A downloadable version of the draft guideline is available to view and print at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatory-compliance/compliance-guides-index/retail-guidance.

No BS: Male Cows (Bulls), Seen As Pests, Are Being Targeted in Uttar Pradesh

cow--strolling in Uttar Predesh

Stray cattle have become a menace in Uttar Pradesh. Photo: Biosphoto/Gil Chamberland

Politicians in the US, the UK and elsewhere often encounter issues they term ‘a load of bull’, or BS. In India’s largest electoral state, Uttar Pradesh, while the leavings of bulls may be problematic enough, it’s the bulls themselves who inadvertently prodded the governing Janta Party (BJP) to take what Asia Times early in March described as “urgent measures” to control the bull population.

Following a recent massive flak over the menace of stray cattle, the party decided to control the bull (and thus the overall cow) population by allowing only female calves to be born.

The government of chief minister Ajay Sing Bisht, also known as Yogi Adityanath, has been feeling the heat over stray cattle destroying crops and becoming an economic hazard to the state’s farmers. Most of the stray cattle were abandoned by farmers owing to the collapse of local cattle markets along with the fear of vigilante groups who disrupt cattle transportation.

https://www.ndtv.com/video/embed-player/?site=classic&id=490920&autostart=false&autoplay=0&pWidth=420&pHeight=315&category=embed

There have also been cases of mob lynchings on suspicion of cow slaughter, which is banned in the state by law. Moreover, as Hindus who are vegetarians, consider the cow to be a sacred symbol of life that should be protected and revered, the rise of the Hindu nationalist BJP and cow-protecting Hindutva vigilantes, cattle slaughter has become a sensitive issue in the Hindi heartland.

With agriculture becoming increasingly mechanized, Asia Times explained, male calves are of little use to farmers, who commonly set them free as they become a financial liability. These bulls then run amok on roads in the cities and destroy farms in the countryside.

INDIA-CRIME-RIOT

Policemen gather outside a police station after reports of mob violence at Chingravati village in Bulandhahr, Uttar Pradesh, on December 3, 2018. Photo: AFP

To introduce some semblance of control, in the government budget for this year, Bisht earmarked 6.12 billion rupees ($87 million) for the protection and welfare of cows, including around 2.5 billion rupees ($35.6 million) for setting up and running cattle shelters for strays.

Female calves only

The sex-selection for bovines involves administering sex-sorted semen, with a concentration of X-sperm, through artificial insemination to produce more female calves than male. But at present, dairy farmers in the state largely depend on natural breeding methods.

“The ‘sexed semen’ method takes the likelihood of delivering a female calf up to 90-95%. With the natural method, it is a 50% chance, just like humans,” Dr. AK Singh, deputy director of Animal Husbandry Department of Uttar Pradesh told Asia Times.

“We will roll out the sex-sorted semen project under our Bovine Artificial Insemination Program in all 75 districts of the state in March,” Dr. Singh said last month. “This will not only ease out the dairy farmers from the burden of maintaining male calves but will serve as a long-term solution to the stray cattle menace caused mainly by the male bovine.”

Using this method, which has been popular in western countries in recent decades, the state government hopes to curb the surplus bullock population within the next 10 years.

The scheme will also be aimed at producing cows of Indian breeds, said a government official on the condition of anonymity. The artificial insemination costs around 1,300 rupees (US$18.40). To avail themselves of the scheme, cattle-breeders would have to pay 300 rupees per conception. However, in the drought-prone region of Bundelkhand, this levy would only be 100 rupees.

Dairy farmers benefit

The government aims to reach out to a maximum number of dairy farmers to encourage them to go for artificial insemination using sexed semen technology.

However, this would be a daunting task. The state has been offering artificial insemination for cows for almost four decades, yet still has not been able to cover the entire breeding population.

A senior bureaucrat told Asia Times, “Most farmers still opt for natural insemination over the artificial (method) due to reasons such as unawareness, inaccessibility and better success rate of conception. The artificial insemination is the most powerful genetic tool for cattle breeding as it involves genetically superior semen. Sexed semen will be a further upgraded version of artificial insemination useful for commercial cattle production.”

The conception through artificial insemination requires 2-3 attempts, which is a cumbersome and prolonged process as each attempt requires a time gap of at least a month. Natural insemination by a male bull typically achieves success in one attempt, a veterinary doctor explained.

Pilot test success

The government’s decision is based on the success of a pilot project launched in three districts (Etawah, Lakhimpur Kheri and Barabanki) two years ago during the previous Samajwadi Party regime.

“By using sexed semen under our artificial insemination program, covering around 500-600 cows in each district, we managed to get 90-95% female offsprings,” said an official.

The department imported the sex-sorted semen from the US through Genus ABS India, an American firm, to run its pilot projects. Each dose of sex-sorted semen cost 1300 rupees, though farmers were not charged. The same firm has been commissioned by the government at Babugarh in Hapur district. Production is expected to start by March, a government official said. The firm has been selected through the global e-tendering process to execute the project.

Congress legislator Deepak Singh supports the move. “It seems to be a good step to tackle the surge in stray cattle population,” he said.

Project Is A Long-Term One

olitical analyst Shivsharan Geharwar said, “The cow shelters are too few in numbers compared to the stray population. Even though the government has geared up to build more shelters, it may take a few years to be able to cater to the entire surplus population. The sex selection would be a long-term measure not only to curb the strays but also help improve the cow economy.”

The move may provide some relief to aggrieved farmers and may tip the upcoming general election in BJP’s favor. Uttar Pradesh sends the largest number of lawmakers to the parliament and will play a key role in electing the federal government, though only time will tell if the move will bear any fruit.

 

Eggciting News: Eggs Aren’t As Unhealthy As Formerly Reported

eggs

Eggs from Lohmann Brown chickens are sorted inside a barn at Meadow Haven Farm, a certified organic family run farm, in Sheffield, Ill., in August 2015. (Daniel Acker/Bloomberg News)

Americans love their eggs — more than… well, not ever, but more than since 1973, anyway.

Egg consumption has been trending upward over the past several years, since the government reversed course and said that, contrary to earlier advice, while eggs are relatively high in cholesterol, eating them won’t necessarily put you at risk of having high cholesterol.

Yes, an explanation is in order:

Live Science cited a report by Ying Rong of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and her colleagues published in the British Journal of Medicine, which reviewed 17 different egg studies. They concluded, “Higher consumption of eggs (up to one egg per day) is not associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease or stroke.’ They cautioned, though, that, ”The increased risk of coronary heart disease among diabetic patients and reduced risk of hemorrhagic stroke associated with higher egg consumption in subgroup analyses warrant further studies.”

The Chinese study is in line with the latest US government thinking, news of which has boosted egg-eating to almost 280 per year.

The last time consumption was this high, The Washington Post reported on February 28, was in 1973.

“This idea that eggs are healthy is really what’s driving this increase in consumption,” Jesse Laflamme, the chief executive of Pete and Gerry’s Organics, a free-range egg producer, told The Post. Laflamme pointed to other factors that have moved consumers to eat more eggs: their low cost compared with meat, the unprocessed nature of organic, free-range eggs, and the feeling of fullness that eating eggs can create.

The greater danger, US nutrition experts now contend, “lies not in products such as eggs, shrimp or lobster, which are high in cholesterol, but in too many servings of foods heavy with saturated fats, such as fatty meats, whole milk, and butter,” The Post reported.

egg_frying

Credit: Deb Lindsey for The Washington Post

The Life Science report cited above, was authored by Katherine Tallmadge, M.A., R.D.,  a registered dietitian and a frequent national commentator on nutrition topics. She’s also the author of Diet Simple: 195 Mental Tricks, Substitutions, Habits & Inspirations” (LifeLine Press, 2011).

Here’s her explanation for the case for eggs in one’s diet:

Yes, increased blood cholesterol levels can raise the risk of heart disease. Eggs are high in dietary cholesterol. But does eating eggs raise blood cholesterol and cause heart disease? This is where the story gets somewhat complicated, so stay with me, folks, and I’ll try to make sense of all of this.

First, the research

Most epidemiological research — the kind of research that studies large populations over time and analyzes their diets and their health — has found no connection between eating eggs and increases in heart disease. On the other hand, controlled clinical studies — where researchers feed subjects specific amounts of cholesterol and measure the effect on blood — do show a slight increase in blood cholesterol with increases in dietary cholesterol, though how much depends on genetic factors.

Cholesterol is an important component of all human and animal cells and influences hormone biology, among other functions. Since your body naturally has all it needs from producing its own cholesterol, there is no dietary requirement for more cholesterol. But the American diet contains plenty, since we eat a lot of animal products. All animal products contain some cholesterol, but they also contain saturated fat, an even more significant culprit in heart-disease risk.

MJS eggs2.jpg

Credit: Archive — jsonline.com

The major determinant of plasma LDL level is saturated fat,said Alice Lichtenstein, professor of nutrition science and policy at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.

And while eggs are high in cholesterol (186 milligrams, 184 of them in the yolk), they’re relatively low in saturated fat (1.6 grams in the yolk).

In most people, for every 100 milligrams reduction in dietary cholesterol, one would predict a reduction in LDL levels of 2.2 points on average,said Wanda Howell, professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Arizona.

In fact, during my 20 years of counseling people with high cholesterol, just reducing their saturated fat intake to a range of 4 percent to 7 percent of their calories, causes their blood cholesterol levels to plummet — a double benefit.

Interestingly, people in Japan — consumers of some of the largest quantities of eggs in the world (averaging 328 eggs consumed per person per year — have low levels of cholesterol and heart disease compared with other developed countries, especially the United States. Why? In part, its because the Japanese eat a diet low in saturated fat.

Americans do just the opposite. Research has shown that we usually have our eggs alongside foods high in saturated fat, such as bacon, sausage and buttered toast. This meal pattern raises LDL levels and makes the effect of eating eggs worse than it actually is.

So how many eggs can you eat? That depends on a number of factors. The American Heart Association no longer includes limits on the number of egg yolks you can eat, but it recommends that you limit your cholesterol intake to 300 milligrams daily, or 200 milligrams if you have heart disease or if your LDL is greater than 100. You decide where that cholesterol comes from!

Other experts go further and say an egg a day is fine.

The amount that one egg a day raises cholesterol in the blood is extremely small, so small in fact that the increase in risk in heart disease related to this change in serum cholesterol could never be detected in any kind of study,said Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard’s School of Public Health.Elevations in LDL of this small magnitude could easily be countered by other healthy aspects of eggs.

Based on the research, my recommendation is if you eat a healthful diet, go ahead and eat an egg a day. (My interview on CNN summarizes the key reasons why.) On the other hand, if your cholesterol is high and if you eat the typical American diet — high in saturated fat, devoid of fruits, vegetables and fiber — maybe you shouldn’t be eating an egg a day.

But will taking eggs out of an unhealthy diet make a positive difference? Probably not. I cant tell you how many times during my career Ive heard people say, Ive cut out eggs, but my cholesterol is still high! The impact of a healthy, balanced diet cannot be denied here.

Good for you

Assuming you’re eating a healthy diet, here are some ways you may benefit by eating eggs.

Protein. Eggs are considered the gold standard that other proteins are measured against. Because of the superior amino acid mix, an egg’s six grams of protein are absorbed easily and efficiently used by the body. The egg is also low-calorie (74 calories).

Choline. Yolks are one of the best sources of this essential nutrient. Choline is needed for brain development in a growing fetus and may also be important for brain function in adults.

Lutein and Zeaxanthin. These two, important, beneficial phytochemicals found in egg yolks (as well as kale and spinach) help prevent eye diseases, especially cataracts and age-related macular degeneration. While eggs contain less lutein and zeaxanthin than greens, these phytochemicals are more absorbable because of the presence of fat in the yolk.

Vitamin D. Eggs are one of the few natural sources of Vitamin D, important for the bones and teeth. Vitamin D aids the absorption of calcium, which is important for the heart and colon, as well.

To bring this all together, here is a recipe that is a regular meal for me any time of the day — quick, easy, delicious, nutritious!

Eggs Scrambled with Onion, Garlic and Sweet Cherry Tomatoes

Servings: 1
Sauté 1/4 sweet onion and a smashed garlic clove over medium-high heat in 1 teaspoon canola or olive oil until almost soft. Add a handful of chopped tomatoes to the pan (or any other vegetables you happen to have, such as chopped spinach, kale, mushrooms or peppers) and cook for another 5 minutes. Turn down the heat to very low. In a separate bowl, whisk two eggs. Pour eggs into the pan containing the onion, garlic and tomato — add 1 ounce low-fat cheese, if you wish. Stir continuously until eggs are cooked. Pour over toasted, whole rye bread.

According to the research arm of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Americans reached the height of their egg consumption at the conclusion of World War II, averaging 404, or more than one a day, in 1945. It bottomed out at 229 in 1992, according to the USDA’s Economic Research Service.

 

 

Cheesy Promo Tops The Bill(board) in Toronto

taco-bell

News of an unusual promotion by Taco Bell in Toronto has prompted comments in The Toronto Sun expressing various levels of interest and disgust as well as one pun that milks the promo for all it’s worth… or less.

The purveyor of pseudo Mexican fast food this Saturday (January 19) will have a billboard next to the company’s main Toronto location dispensing “warm, gooey nacho cheese” onto TB snack items offered up by consumers.

A press announcement declared early this month that the three-hour cheese puffery will promote the launch of the Nacho Cheese Naked Chicken Chalupa, a more cheesy rendition of Taco Bell’s Naked Chalupa – which features a crispy marinated chicken shell stuffed with nacho cheese.

“Can’t wait,” Jason Brearly enthused.

“Somehow I have visions of a billboard beside the highway dripping with cheese [with] seagulls, flies and rats all enjoying the bounty,” David Shortling commented. (He doesn’t note where flies will come from in mid-January.)

How long, wondered Mark Black, “do you reckon before the first botulism case shows up and how long before people find bugs in their nacho cheese?”

Julie Mitchell spread a different message: “What a friend we have in cheeses.”

The weather forecast anticipated light snow and temperatures in the area of -10C (14F) for Saturday.

Marketing Dive noted that the “Cheesiest Billboard” is the latest in a long line of stunts from Taco Bell, which is vying to attract Gen Z consumers, who are showing slightly more interest in fast food than older generations.

Taco Bell in November “hijacked” the Big Ben clock tower in London to celebrate new restaurant locations opening in the city. The famous tower has been under construction and silent for more than a year. Taco Bell worked with a sound engineer to compose the chimes using parametric speakers in the surrounding area to recreate the famous Taco Bell bell toll. The chain also unveiled CrunchWrapping Paper for holiday gift wrap and the Baja Blast Hair Salon offering blue dye jobs in previous marketing stunts last year.

Developments concerning food — from research to farm to factory to restaurants and home.